Skip to content
Importivity
← Tariff news
Court ruling / IEEPAUnder litigationPublished October 8, 2026

Trade Court Certifies Refund Class for Unlawful IEEPA Duties

The Court of International Trade certified a class of importers seeking liquidation or reliquidation of entries without unlawful IEEPA duties. The ruling covers importers of record that paid those duties during the class period, except entities that filed separate refund suits.

Authority
USCIT Rule 23(b)(2), class certification in a Court of International Trade case concerning IEEPA duties
Status
Under litigation
Effective
October 8, 2026

The update

The Court of International Trade granted class certification and appointment of class counsel in Freestyle World, Inc. v. United States. The certified class is defined as all importers of record who paid duties imposed by the challenged tariff orders between February 1, 2025 and February 19, 2026, excluding any entity that separately filed an action seeking to recover IEEPA duty payments. The court certified the class under USCIT Rule 23(b)(2).

The relief sought is an injunction directing liquidation or reliquidation of entries without regard to unlawfully imposed IEEPA duties. The opinion states that the Supreme Court held on February 20, 2026 that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, and it describes prior court orders directing CBP to liquidate or reliquidate entries without those duties. The court said this class action is intended to reach importers and entries that may not be resolved through voluntary use of CBP's CAPE refund process.

The opinion says CBP implemented the CAPE program as an automated mechanism for liquidation, reliquidation, and refunds, including interest, on entries subject to IEEPA duties. The court noted that CAPE does not accept certain categories of entries, including finally liquidated entries of non-plaintiff importers of record, and that some importers have not used the program. The government has also appealed the portion of a prior order in the V.O.S. case that provided for liquidation or reliquidation of all affected entries, and that appeal remains pending.

Impact

This ruling matters because it may expand the path to refunds for importers that paid unlawful IEEPA duties but did not file their own cases. For finance teams, the issue is recovery of prior duty outlays and interest, with direct effects on cash flow. For compliance teams, the mechanism still turns on entry status, liquidation posture, and CBP processing.

What to watch

This opinion certifies a class, but it does not itself state that refunds are complete or automatic for every importer. Related refund relief remains tied to litigation and CBP processing, and the opinion notes a pending appeal over the scope of liquidation and reliquidation orders.

How to prepare

  1. 1
    Pull affected entry data

    Identify entries from the class period and isolate deposits tied to the challenged IEEPA duties.

  2. 2
    Confirm importer of record entities

    Match entries to the legal entities that served as importer of record.

  3. 3
    Check liquidation status

    Liquidation posture can affect how any refund process is handled.

  4. 4
    Review CAPE participation

    Compare filed and unfiled claims to see which entries may still need attention.

  5. 5
    Coordinate with customs counsel

    Class membership and overlap with separate lawsuits should be reviewed carefully.

Sources

We summarize published reporting and official notices. Always confirm rates and dates against the Federal Register or your customs broker before acting on them.